Arguendo, let’s assume that your assertions as to Senator Byrd’s actions and Senator Landrieu’s positions are right. However, Senator Landrieu did not vote on the bill itself but merely its consideration. As such, she picked the “perfect” time to have the Louisiana provision added to the bill. She procured assistance for Louisiana in the legislation while retaining the right to vote against the bill later if it does not conform to her principles.

Al, even though you and I may differ on the conclusion, I appreciate your penchant for framing the argument in rather amicable terms.

Now, the word “bribe” also has a technical legal definition associated with it. Sen. Landrieu did nothing illegal with that vote. Whether or not what she did constitutes “political corruption” or merely “making the best deal possible” for Louisiana is for Louisiana voters to decide.

I think what she did to Louisiana voters follows along the lines of what “Barack Obama” was accused of doing by the “Chinese president” in the opening skit of this past weekend’s SNL… and no kisses.

However, if you actually want to make a case for “bribery” in this particular case, please make it. Perhaps, you’ve heard of Stevens, Byrd, and Cochran. If you can, please distinguish between those good ole boys’ pork and that of Louisiana’s lady.